Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN

Balochistan Service Tribunals Act 1974 R8 8, 9 and 10 Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (V 1974), Appointment of Appellate Retention Appellants / Government Employees Section 4 seniority who was selected for appointment in 1972 as the undergraduates were trained. And during their services their supplies were released. About one year after his appointment, his training appellant was reinstated by the Board of Revenue order about five to five years after his dismissal. The appellants claimed their supremacy in 1972 from the date of their initial recruitment that they were directly appointed as a scholar and timely. During which time he will remain out of service until his termination, unless his re-appointment is made in his service, the restoration order states that the appellant will suffer any loss, compensation or removal for the period. Were not eligible for arrears or other benefits. The appellants accepted such an order of rehabilitation as a whole and did not challenge any part of it. Nothing was in the record which stated that the interruption period was ever included in their service. Unless otherwise known R8, Pakistan Tehsildari and Deputy Tehsildar Rules 1962 and term are selected for appointment. Service members used in Rr 9 & 10 of the Rule above. Used in a variety of senses, selection could not be equal to appointment. Appellants were the only candidates, not the service members and their services, when the Tehsildars would take charge after their service was formalized. To be considered criminal advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer