Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/109/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Articles 204 and 439 for the trial of the accused in the trial proceedings issued by the trial court filed by the complainant The contents of the IR were identified by the witnesses in front of the police under Section 161, CR PC and the complainant's statement was made before the court as witnesses for the prosecution and then it was clearly Concluded that there was sufficient material in his opinion to prosecute the accused even though the complainant was not yet before the trial court. This test was subjected to, yet such a statement may be eligible for the purposes of 204 5, the PC Trial Court had already legally reviewed and found the offense. , An opinion regarding its presence. The grounds for such prosecution and the jurisdiction to prosecute the defendants on the basis of the material stated by the trial court were not open to any valid. The request for review against the immunity order was dismissed accordingly best advocate from Sehar Baqlas lawyer