Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE STATE

Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 506/387 Law e-testimony (10 of 1984), Art 163 Bail, date of grant of incident was not mentioned in FIR: no pattern of accused's handwriting Was taken and the alleged letter was written by the accused not sent to the handwriting expert to ascertain whether the accused had written or not filed a case against the accused before the trial. Had been sworn in on the Koran by dismissing the accused's request for bail. The court had clearly violated Article 163 of the 1984 law and the Supreme Court ruled that no crime against the accused was attracted to the prohibited clause of section 497; the PCP admitted the accused on bail. Done, under the circumstances attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mangi lawyer