MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
XO, R 22 Cross appeal dismissed as original timeline of Civil Procedure Code Order XLI of CPC appeals was rejected as time was up. It was permissible while the applicant's time was barred from departing because the applicant's appeal was banned, although over time the applicant's appeal could be banned, so too. Could be treated and dealt with as a cross-object. It should be suspended and disposed of as an attachment and respondents may file objections within 30 days of service of the notice and after the person approved by the Lower Appellate Court is in jurisdiction. The High Court set aside and the case was remanded. After considering the applicant's appeal as a cross-objection, the lower appellate court renewed its decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Dhatmal lawyer