Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) argues that the accused was convicted on the basis of vague, sketchy and untrue evidence and was sentenced to death which should have been denied. And furthermore, there was never a defensive version. The prosecution's evidence was justified which led to a serious bias and it was considered appropriate to set aside the unclean verdict solely on this score, and to examine the whole of the evidence in a regressive record. Was considered in the interest of justice. To find out whether the High Court has followed the principles of safe management of justice in criminal cases, according to which the accused was allowed by the Supreme Court to appeal?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Padidan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.