SHAFI ULLAH versus THE STATE
Definitions of section 2 (2 (b) / re 34) were immediately filed in the FIR and it was daylight that the accused with the specific role was immediately named in the FIR, There was no contradiction in the account, and the medical evidence, unavailable on the spot, showed that only one bullet killed each of the accused, who was accused of setting up a defense request. Was unsuccessful and was admitted to the scene, and the testimony of eyewitnesses was believable and the eyewitnesses proved to be true witnesses while eyewitnesses were closely related. There are witnesses, but they had no previous hostility to making false accusations of the accused or substitute, except the real culprit; Proved that the accused was the real culprit. An innocent teen died due to a fireworks injury. The trial court has registered a case against him. The accused cannot be interfered with. The accused was not with the accused through the complainant, but the accused was sentenced to death, And it was not appropriate, therefore, was sentenced to life in prison.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Hariwala lawyer
