Find a Lawyer

DUR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

There was no direct evidence available to prosecute the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) and 342 evidence and the entire case was based on circumstantial evidence the accused was seen standing in front of the otic only where the body of the deceased child was found, But the evidence of the circumstances did not explain why the accused was standing there after the commission of the crime, no previous animosity between the parties was present. The prosecution's witness improved his first statement in the case, not supporting the medical evidence prosecution's version. used to. Only the medical officer could not prevail on the circumstantial evidence, the prosecution's witnesses could not be considered as true witnesses and no reliance on their testimony could be relied upon. The accused was acquitted under the circumstances. advocate for immigration from Bhara Kahu lawyer