SAUDI-PAK INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED, ISLAMABAD versus MOHIB TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED LAHORE
Section 9 and 10 of the Banker's Book Proof Act (X91II of 1891), Section 2 (8), in their request for the defense of the resignation of photocopies of the documents prepared by the plaintiff to recover the bank loan. The leave was not denied for the claim was made in the statement of the plaintiff's account but in addition to the purchase price he was also in accordance with the financial transaction agreements and the statements of the accounts and verified / verified under the Banker's Book Proof Act 1891. There was an error because the document was not processed. They were considered to be admitted by the defendants, the accuracy of the statements with the accounts was judged and since the leave application for defense was dismissed and there was no evidence to deny the documents on record. The verdict of this case was pronounced circumstantial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
