Find a Lawyer

MST. FARIDA BIBI versus SABIR HUSSAIN

During the trial, under section 42 and 54 of the Special Relief Act 1877 and 54 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), for the declaration of section 42 suit and the permanent order of the defendants. One of the special enrollees, a mysterious unmarried married woman, allegedly filed a request to revoke a false, fake and fake admission that she claimed she had never heard of a lawyer. No lawyer was taken in favor or served in the favor, but the trial court dismissed him. The petition filed without the proper view and review of the evidence filed against the trial court's order was also dismissed by the High Court claimant when it was not when the defendant allegedly received a thumb impression on the Power of Attorney. When pasted, its contents were read to him. It was made aware of the fact that based on the impression of his thumb on the Power of Attorney, his rights in the property could have been settled. It was directed that the contents of the documents affecting his interest be read correctly and that the same was made to understand the result of the trial court. Since the High Court brought the evidence to the wrong record and compiled the cases in violation of the law and the parties' requests, the High Court's decision was immediately illegal, which the Supreme Court had set aside in the appeal and the case thereafter. After hearing the verdict, he received further remand famous high court advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer