TAHIR NAWAZ versus THE STATE
The testimony of section 2 (2 (b) / re 34) was not found at the time of the witnesses present at the time that the testimony and medical evidence were in clear conflict with each other, before the eyewitness brought it to the trial court. According to the postmortem report, in the same case, the main accused, who according to the FIR was hurt in the head, was acquitted, no crime was recovered from the incident site, Was involved in four criminal incidents, likely to take place in the dark hours of the night and thus not being witnessed by anyone, The accused could not be convicted merely because of the allegations. The witnesses were closely linked to the deceased. The accused, who was examined by the independent witness, was acquitted on the benefit of the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Gojra lawyer
