Find a Lawyer

SYED SIKANDAR ALI SHAH versus AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN

R6 (2) (3) (4) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 11 (1) (i) Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R41 (b) (iv) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Termination of employment The government employees after obtaining the prior approval of the competent authority of their parent department Joined another organization under which to maintain his license for two years. After terminating their services on behalf of other employees, the Government employees submitted a report of joining their parents' department on 4 2 1998, which is pending for 3/2 months, after which their Services were discontinued under the order of 13 5 1998 to 7 May. 5 1996 ie the date on which he was relieved to join another organization service tribunal, relying on R 6 (2) of the Government Employees' Certification (Certification of Government Jobs) Rules, 1993 was dismissed. Unless authorized, ority was expressly empowered by some constitution or rules under which the closing order of 13 1998 was declared void, under which government employees (certification) rules, No special rule of 1993 was mentioned on the basis that it terminated the termination of the services of civil servants. Former Impact of Government Employee was Illegal The Government employee submitted a report of joining the Parent Department on 2 2 1998, ie within two years the entitlement to which the public servant was permanently transferred to another organization Was not absorbed in this way, thus it could be entitled to it. The department cannot be eliminated, a tax advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer