Find a Lawyer

SYED YAQOOB SHAH versus XEN PESCO (WAPDA), PESHAWAR

On the direction of the Army Officer under Section 5 Electricity Act (IX of 1910), Sections 39 and 39 of a Federal Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Section 39A The termination of the shield was filed against the owner of the brick kiln in Act 1910 on the charge of obtaining an unauthorized connection with the sub-divisional officer of the electrical supply for removing and reversing the power meter that the applicant (of WAPDA). The employee (s) called the meter, on which the Executive Engineer was called without any investigation and investigation of the matter, after receipt of the clarification the applicant issued a show cause notice. Was made, and thereafter the Service Tribunal dismissed the legitimate contracting authority under the applicant's request under 5. Power Development Authority Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1978, enjoyed jurisdiction in connection with the investigation, but applied to the executive engineer and sub divisional officer on the basis of conditional action. It was terminated because the Army team in charge had a note written on the record Service dismissing it did not show the department record. On the basis of this provision it was ordered that the applicant comply with the Sub Divisional Officer and the Executive Engineer. Instead of doing so, the army officer had the option of terminating the authority, saying that the fire Was illegal order should follow the recommended way to punish the receiver sheet. The Supreme Court upheld the appeal and accepted the offense for removing the meter. Set aside the service tribunal's decision to remove the applicant from the job. Egg ask a advocate free from Mardan lawyer