WATER & POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus KHALID PERVAIZ
Power Act 1910 Section 26 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Issue of Detection Bill for Electricity Theft The jurisdiction of the Electric Inspector Order referred to the Electric Inspector's decision for the matter to be decided by the Authority. Assuming that the user was a tracking bill for theft of electricity and did not include the measuring equipment used for power theft, the matter should not have been sent to the Checking Committee / Electric Inspector's Report. It indicated that the user allegedly used a device / wire that caused interference. In addition to measuring equipment that did not accurately reflect the consumption of electricity by consumers, under the circumstances came under the purview of Section 26 (b) of the Electricity Act 1910 and the Electric Inspector, who were given large powers. Were. Consider the underlying issues, which was the jurisdiction to decide the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
