Find a Lawyer

RAUF B. KADRI versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

Direction of the Companies Ordinance 1984 Section 306 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R 10 In the case of a financial institution, the direction of the financial institution suffered a loss of more than four billion rupees against the investment of 0 billion 656 billion and He was unable to pay it. The State Bank of Pakistan became party to the change / replacement proceedings following the withdrawal of the other party and none of its former members objected to such pending notice under section 306, Companies Ordinance, 1984. And the aforementioned party had already suffered failure. To respond to the notice, a petition was filed against the Financial Institute State Bank of Pakistan, followed by a notice to the applicant as a replacement / replacement under section 306, section 306 under the Companies Ordinance, 1984. There was no need to start anew by issuing notices as non-service. The ordinance of the companies, which was not fatal for 1984, was applied as a whale because it is like supply and if the demand is not secured or the loan is not settled then it is assumed to be unable to pay the debt. property advocate from Upper Deval lawyer