GHULAM QADIR ALIAS QADIR BAKHSH versus HAJI MUHAMMAD SULEMAN
Civil Procedure Code Order XVII and XVII of CPC Adjustments, Rr 1 (3) (Lahore Amendment) and 3 Proof Suits, dismissed despite numerous occasions, the plaintiffs failed to present their evidence, the trial court, The plaintiff's evidence was closed and the case dismissed under O XVII, R 3, the CPC plea taken by the plaintiff was that instead of dismissing the case under O XVII, R 3, CPC, the trial proceeded o XVII, R 1 (3). Where the plaintiffs' plea was pending and they failed to comply with the trial court's order in presenting their evidence, the court acted rightly under O XVII, R 3, CPC instead of O XVII, R1. ? 3), the CPC order passed by the trial court, under which the plaintiff's evidence was closed and the case dismissed, was unthinkable and was not interfered with by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Shamsabad lawyer