Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANIK versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) evidence was admired in the brand of the victim's home during the dark hours of the night, and the attackers were identified in the light of the lantern, especially when the aforementioned lantern was not occupied. The correction that the complainant made in his supplementary statement during the police investigation was wrong and could not be relied upon by other eyewitnesses in pursuit of the aforesaid improvement, the complainant also The role of the train recognized that the accused and their evidence were not credible and that the guns recovered from the accused were not sent to the Franz Science Laboratory for comparison with the crime scene and had no significance. It could not be considered as a piece of evidence Medical evidence denied it. Adoption of Accountability Account, Enmity between Parties, Filed, Investigation of False Prosecution The absence of implementation of a criminal conviction cannot be dismissed; And could not be relied on the same evidence when the accused was convicted in the capital. The accused were acquitted in the circumstances jobs for fresh advocates from Haveli Kahuta lawyer