Find a Lawyer

SHER ZAMAN versus THE STATE

Sections 302, 324, 337 F (ii) and 337 F (iv) Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 4 The arrest of the wounds inflicted by witnesses on the value of evidence I was confessed and his witnesses went to him. According to the FIR, the accused's home was peacefully used empty-handed with his father's licensed rifle when the defense version introduced in the case was neither invoked during the investigation nor in the trial. Was established, according to the FIR, while the automatic 222 was killed and witnesses were hurt by being armed with an unlicensed rifle and therefore, despite the subsequent evidence of the use of licensed weapons, this jurisdiction by special court There will be no harm to the option in which a scheduled offense was committed, unless the Additional Sessions Judge ( Royal Judge) Special Court were additional charge and even if the case against the accused terrorist activities (Special Courts) Act, was not admissible as a crime under the 1975 default. , The trial can be prosecuted by the Additional Sessions Judge during his general jurisdiction hearing because the accused did not face prejudice in any procedure or any particular law prosecution case and no one on the day of the incident. Was not uncommon. There was no diminishing case in favor of the defendant, who, acting without cruelty, killed both the witnesses and witnesses. Injured, the accused under section 2302 (b) were punished law firms from Lakimarwat lawyer