Find a Lawyer

FAZAL DIN versus MIAN LIAQUAT ALI

Sections 50 and 77 of the Punjab Tenancy Act 1887, Second Group (G) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 115 and OVII, R 10 suits which are in possession of The claim was that, with no dreadful authority, he was expelled from the suit, while only his owner could be evicted, and according to law, the civil court withdrew the plaintiff's affirmation and held that The plaintiff has been deported without law and even by the defendants. Even though the claimant was the owner / landlord, the procedure for providing such occupancy was provided under the Punjab Tenancy CT, 1887, required by the tenant under section 50 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887. By filing a lawsuit, the tenant can help with the removal or removal of the wrong tenant. In a revenue court pursuant to Section 77, Group III, sub-clause (g), no other court can take cognizance of a dispute or case under which no case can be established. der This kind of Imp Impressive Order was not vulnerable to any kind of weakness patent advocate from Takhtbai lawyer