MRS. BATOO versus SHAHZAD
Provincial Small Causes Courts Act 1887 Section 25 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Section 84 for the recovery of the amount the plaintiff sued on the basis of a tenancy agreement executed by the parties from the execution of the defendant / contract. The plaintiff and the plaintiff inspect the defendant's signatures. By referring the documents to the expert, but failing to contest the defendant's request for such, the trial court proceeded to dismiss the case and the trial court dismissed the trial court's Article Article 84 of the law evidence. To compare defendant's signatures. 1984 failed to show that the court-approved decision by the trial was not based on reasonable reasoning, especially when the defendant's paragraph regarding the defendant's execution of the contract Was not denied nor can it be denied. The plaintiff's case has been taken up by the court, which has failed to consider all the circumstances of the case, and set aside the trial court / Small Causes Court's decision to write a decision in accordance with the F-law and on the evidence available on record. went
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Chicha watni lawyer