IMDAD ALI JUNEJO versus THE STATE
Control of the Narcotic Substance Act, 1997, Section 9 and 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 555 under the Prevention of Drugs Act, Section 21 of the Law Enforcement Articles Act 1997 Had demonstrated. And that was violated when, under routine patrol, the police reached the party to a suspect whom he wanted to investigate and if strict action was taken on section 21, then the required position was not available. The suspect may have fled or fled, however, where the FIR clearly states that a hatchet was reported and police have been notified about the exact location of the suspect. , Then spying on the views of section 21 of the said Act should also have been reported. The matter was previously available to the police, but they did not comply with the provisions of section 21 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, pending an action against the accused. Things were overturned in the trial court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Buchay Key lawyer