Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ ALI SHAH versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD., H.Q., ISLAMABAD

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 494 Disapproved breach of jurisdiction when the charge was withdrawn by a competent authority or public prosecutor under section 494. The CCP will be of the opinion that the evil did not benefit from any doubt. Honorable breeze or otherwise was purely immoral and out of place honorable bait was a criminal code of conduct, completely alien to 1898. As there was no self-made terminology. In support of the rule of withdrawal under section 494, the PCP was only that if the eviction occurred before the charge, it was compelled to expel the accused and if it occurred after the indictment. , He was acquitted. It was just as good a crime as it would have been in any other situation, but with the dismissal from the prosecution, the prosecution was put on a better basis because the prosecutor said that there was no possibility of retribution and that the allegation was baseless. No proof. Importing a term like "honorable bait" was not justified and was not provided anywhere in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 best advocate from Swatmingora lawyer