Find a Lawyer

MADINA TRADERS, MAIN BAZAR, SHEIKHUPURA versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, ZON C, LAHORE

The Income Tax Ordinance 1979S, 24 (Fate), 59, 66A and 136 (2) of the Assisi withdrew its income, which was accepted under the Self Assessment Scheme, the Assisi was later transferred to Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Notice was issued under The cancellation of such an assessment, which was legally inconsistent with the non-payment of the lease by cross-check, was affected by section 24 (ff) of the Ordinance Reviewing Authority, it explained the assimilation. Was rejected and the latest tribunal was decided following the approval of the case after canceling such an assessment. In the assessment that the provisions of section 24 (ff) F were not attracted at the relevant time, it rejected the appeal that the evidence presented earlier was insufficient to prove the dispute that the lease amount was 12 Paid in equal installments, such testimonial evidence of justification cannot be called as A has raised the question of law simply because the tribunal rejected the plea that, in the given situation, an equality in particular The payments were made in a particular manner and would not raise any questions of law, especially during the year in the subdivision. Thus, no question can be said about the law arising, if the evidence was not based on the law, then this order could give rise to a question related to the law. ???? how to become a advocate from Sanghar lawyer