Find a Lawyer

RIZWAN AHMAD ALIAS BILLU versus THE STATE

Articles 2?2 (b), 7 i7a (i) and 34 34 definitions of evidence, reduction of the accused were immediately named in the FIR filed and this is the light of day which is also admitted by the accused. And two months prior to the clash between the victim and the accused party. The incident, but was compromised with respect, did not occur during the two months, which showed that there was no prejudice to avenge the events that preceded it and that the incident did not occur. The timely offer and no plans were made. Only the accused was found responsible for the traumatic injury and also the reason for the recovery of blood stains case against the accused. , Which was fully proven by the testimony of the prosecution witnesses through medical evidence, was rightfully under section 302 (b). Was found guilty. ), The perpetrator of the PPC indictment was retained, but since no previous rivalry or motive was attributed to the accused. Conviction of the victim's death and whether it was intentional or premature killing, there were mitigating circumstances to lessen the accused, the death sentence imposed by the trial court was changed to life imprisonment. That the accused was not convicted. v. Injury to the deceased, but he had suffered minor injury to the prosecution witness with the sticks co-accused, it cannot be said that in the circumstances the Tender offense of the co-accused responsible for causing the death of the deceased. Section 302 (b) was held, Wee accordingly punished under section 337A, PPC jobs for fresh advocates from Haroonabad lawyer