HUSSAIN MUHAMMAD versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, ISLAMIA COLLEGE, PESHAWAR
Advertisement of constitutional petition of Arts 199 and 8 requesting foreign scholarship for approval of Ex-Pakistan Study Leave / No objection certificate and refusal to issue fund The university dispute was due to time constraints. And the increased cost, the number of benefits was reduced. While correct constitutional policy decisions should not be interfered with by the court, the facts of the present case using constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the constitution, rejecting the defendant's unwarranted policy, guaranteed the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. Don't give When it was based on a public policy aimed at transparency, rationality and natural justice, the applicant approached the High Court with open hands and he barred the main obstacle for handling his complaint through the Constitutional Court. On the other hand, the High Court had to consider the legality of the earlier plea in the unlawful polk y scholarship award that could lead to an undesirable decision affecting the rights of the applicant. Neither the proceedings nor any proceedings of Parliament can be terminated due to infringement of fundamental rights Yes. The applicant had obtained the right to apply for the scholarship offered by the respondent University through the advertisement, which would be considered in accordance with the terms of the representation / presentation of the advertisement offered by the University to the said public. The applicant had taken some action in pursuit of the advertisement, which was filed by the respondent University
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
