Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION versus MUHAMMAD AZAM KATPER

Section 2A [as amended by the Service Tribunals (Amendment) Act (XVII of 1997) from 10 to 1997], 4 and 6 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A, 37 and 38 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ), Arts 199 and 212 (3) Transferred from another mill As a result of the transfer of service tribunal scope respondents / employees, the applicant joined the corporation on 19 6 1989, which he was informed by order. , Dated 18 7 1989, was told that his sanity would be counted. Such an order was challenged before the Labor Court for his involvement in the service of the respondents of the corporation, which also fixed the petitioners' petition filed before the Labor Appellate Tribunal on 299-1994, It was also dismissed on 14-12 1995, upholding the order of the Constitutional Court of Labor. After the issuance of Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, both labor reinforcement orders were refused to be challenged, after which the applicant filed appeals before the service tribunal which was dismissed only after Labor's Constitutional requests to reject appointment decisions should remain in the field, as legal, correct and effective orders have reached the deadline, so the determination of respondent's superannuation has become a thing of the past and a closed deal is answered in favor of the voters. went. Depending on the aforementioned decisions, which cannot be relied upon or impaired by the filing of Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, the service tribunal shall have the authority to issue jurisdiction over the appeal of a public servant by the Department Authority. There will be no one else approved. Jurisdiction to revoke / revoke labor hierarchy orders / decisions top advocate from Haroonabad lawyer