Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b), 324 and 398 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) to ratify the defense version either directly or in the circumstances Related evidence is not supported. Arms (pistol) from the accused on the occasion of the accused and his confession that the victim had identified wounds in his presence. The robbery was committed at the complainant's house, killing the victim and causing the prosecutor's witness to suffer injuries from the fire in the street that led to the trial of terrorism under section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. Was brought. No clemency can be attached to the school leaving certificate prepared by the accused in the High Court as no petition was made for the minority at the trial and no evidence was presented in the evidence. Along with the police file, the criminal record was recorded over 25 years of age and as such, he was not very young when there was no mitigating factor in favor of the accused on the lesser charge. Available on the record of terrorists convicted under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, being an independent offense, such offenses under Section 302 (b), PPC and section 7 of the said Act. Permission to appeal was quite legal. The Supreme Court dismissed the accused in the circumstances advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer