Find a Lawyer

KHAN AMIR KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 / evidence 34 Testimony of Evidence Two-eyed witnesses, who were the father's son and were closely related to the deceased, made contradictory statements to the trial court; The same evidence was upheld by the trial court and an appeal was filed for his failure. An appeal was filed against each other, on the same evidence the conviction of the accused could not be sustained which was appreciated and used in the decision to acquit the three accomplices of interest and extraordinary eye evidence. No free rhythm was available for. There were suspicions in the story of the witnesses and the prosecution that, although the accused was absconding for five years, it was of little importance because those who were innocent in the case were also fearful of arrest and tortured by the police. Created and sentenced. The accused were set aside and used by the trial court tax advocates from Astore lawyer