Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHAN AMIR KHAN versus THE STATE


Section 2302 / evidence 34 Testimony of Evidence Two-eyed witnesses, who were the father's son and were closely related to the deceased, made contradictory statements to the trial court; The same evidence was upheld by the trial court and an appeal was filed for his failure. An appeal was filed against each other, on the same evidence the conviction of the accused could not be sustained which was appreciated and used in the decision to acquit the three accomplices of interest and extraordinary eye evidence. No free rhythm was available for. There were suspicions in the story of the witnesses and the prosecution that, although the accused was absconding for five years, it was of little importance because those who were innocent in the case were also fearful of arrest and tortured by the police. Created and sentenced. The accused were set aside and used by the trial court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Gharo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.