Find a Lawyer

SUBA versus CIVIL JUDGE, 1ST CLASS CHINIOT, DISTRICT JHANG

Code of Conduct 1908 read with Section 12 (2) Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Former Decree obtained from Fraud and Misrepresentation After the trial court recorded the evidence, Section 12 (2) The application was dismissed, which was ordered by the review court's accuracy report on the preliminary summons, stating that the applicant's address was not valid but the summons was re-issued at the old address, but the process server reported that the request The applicants refused to accept the service and there were also written statements from several applicants. It was filed in court on the same date, but since then his lawyer has not seriously opposed the approval of the Fingerprint Expert decree, saying that such a written statement and a power of attorney would be more than a thumbs up. Most impressions were not clear for comparison. Applicants, who were unauthorized at the time of their inspection, had the impression that they were not served; some of them were minor and did not live at the address given on the plant. And they did not appoint anyone as their lawyer because at the time a minority of the applicants were recognized while one of the respondents did not appear on the merit while appearing as a witness. Did not consider the full evidence on record and issued a summons. Whereby it was proved that the applicant's services were accepted by the High Court under section 12 (2), the CPC filed by the applicants and the decisions and orders passed by the courts on the one hand. Whereby this case is pending tax advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer