Find a Lawyer

WAHID ALI ARIF CHISHTI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Sections 2 (s) 156 (1) (8), 178 and 185 of a Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Sections 173, 265A and 561 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition on a Bilateral Interim Charge Sheet Jurisdiction It was claimed that approximately four months after the interim charge sheet section 173 (?), CRPC was filed in violation, the petitioner was brought before the magistrate under the provisions of the offense. More than 17 period days were provided for filing the report / invoice. The petition was filed with the applicant under Section 561A, CR PC before the High Court under the Customs Act, 1969 and before the High Court under section 265 K, CR PC under trial and alternative remedy. The petitioner has already moved the application under Section 265 K, CR PC. The trial court was postponed until there was an unusual case where the High Court should have exercised its extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction to interfere with the proceedings pending in the trial court. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, follows the usual procedure immigration advocates contact from Battagram lawyer