MUHAMMAD HASSAN, STENOGRAPHER, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, PRIVATIZATION COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD
Section 4 Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974, R21 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, Twelfth, R1 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) for leave. Discrimination Appeal was banned for 23 days Applicants' position was that the verdict was pronounced on 21 10 2000, but after waiting for its certified copy from the service tribunal, it requested for its own copy. Applicable on 6 12 2000 and upon receipt of the same, the certified copy of the Tribunal is obliged to send to the concerned parties under the registered cover as signed 21 Servic. e The Service Tribunals (Rules) are attached to the Memorandum of Appeal as verified on the copy of the Decision 1974 Rules. Its copy was issued to the applicant on 6-11 2000 and it will be deemed that the copy was sent under the registered cover but was properly received, if the applicant made any other claim, The burden shifted. Be satisfied that the Tribunal did not send a copy of the decision under the registered cover and did not receive the same ground appealed by the petitioner that despite the verdict of the decision, he had not received it, as he was legally Was not acceptable because under Article 27 of the General Clause. The Act, 1897, was of the view that the service was influenced by a registered cover envelope on which the decision was made and received.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
