Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL, FRONTIER CORPS, N-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Applicant was sentenced to be employed as a Frontier Corps for disobedience to lawful orders, against which his court The appeal was made before the dismissal of the service tribunal as well. The accuracy inquiry committee collected enough material to prove that the applicant was guilty of complying with the legal orders of his order, which was a breach of the good order of the conduct service, as the applicant was a member of the disciplinary force. Was obliged to comply with the legal orders issued by him. , But he was reluctant to do so so that the petitioner boycotted the departmental examination and persuaded other members of the force not to appear in the examination that the petitioner wanted to hold the examiner of his choice, which is in accordance with some of the principles of the inquiry committee. Accordingly was not valid. Formed, the applicant did not accept its formation and prayed that its members were like some other units, that the applicant's conduct was sufficient to prove that he did not care about command orders. And has intentionally violated legal orders. Such behavior of the applicant was not only inappropriate for the member of the Discipline Force but was also strongly objected to. An employee of the government tribunal approved by the service tribunal was not open to an exception The Supreme Court refused to grant an appeal and dismissed the application in the circumstances. online advocate from Toru lawyer