Find a Lawyer

AMAN ULLAH KHAN versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN

Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Section 9 Financial Institutions (Restoration of Finance) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Section 5 Appeal Principle, M / s Chenab Cement Product (Private) Limited and Other Banks Tribunal, Lahore Presented. The Banking Tribunal had passed the order before presenting the date of judgment in the case of LH 672 applicable judgment and Chenab cement product in accordance with PLD 1996, and was challenged by filing the present appeal. The appellant contended that the subject matter of the judgment was bound to be kept aside from the present appeal as it was not protected by the said judgment wherein the appeal was filed in accordance with the provisions of section 9 of the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984 Went, the decision was not saved under appeal, and was not made. Messrs. Chenab is subject to the decision of the Cement Product case and the meaning of the decision in D and previous and closed cases within the scope. The Cree passed by the Banking Tribunal was set aside and the case for recovery of financial debt should be considered pending before the newly constituted Banking Courts established under Section 5 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001. Yes, circumstances allowed an appeal. advocate from Orakzai lawyer