HAJI MATEENUDDIN versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Guarantee, the only Chief Cashier's Grant of the Bank to be charged was done. In this case, when the applicant was shown as a prosecution witness in the list of such witnesses, the final invoice was presented after 15 months showing the applicant for the first time as the applicant in the challan. Nothing was offered or relied on to move from. The witness list of the applicant's accused was the same, if no evidence was collected during the submission of the interim challan and final challan applicant, if the participant's bail was not on the basis of the sanction of the accused, the department inquiry Was completely punished. In the applicant's bank case, immediately after circulating all the banks, the loss of bonds was not harmed in any way, as it demanded further inquiry, it was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Ghazi lawyer