Find a Lawyer

BADSHAH HASSAN versus INTERIOR MINISTRY

Rr 3 (d), 4 (1) (b) (ii), 5 & 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) dissatisfaction with service. In addition to the performance and willful absence of the mandatory retirement department, appeals from government employees to public servants were dismissed by government employees who were negligent, negligent and careless of public servants with government employees. The attitude is a sign that he never took his duties seriously. And was absent on various occasions without the knowledge of the relevant constituents, which led to the mismanagement of all necessary legal rituals compiled under the Public Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 and after its completion, Subsequent hearing opportunities arose. , Was civilly treated by a civil servant and had to retire due to absenteeism, desert and non-interest in public employment. Relationships, after paying travel with a monthly pension and no injustice to anyone, were taken by authorized authority, neither serious nor honest, but it was based on sound reasoning, solid and credible. And hardly any interference was called for by the service tribunal rightly so. Refused to interfere divorce advocates from Kamalia lawyer