Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MUTALIB versus ABDUL BASIR

At the time of the testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 307/34, the defendant's act was invasive and there was no opportunity for him to act in defense. The accused could not benefit from his injuries. During the incident he did not receive any reports of such minor disturbance, saying that the nature of the injuries was so superficial that it was not required to be explained by the prosecution, on the occasion the presence of both parties, including the accused. It was also proved and some people due to slight repetition between the two, the accused brought an ax and used it for the purpose which got the FIR, it was immediately registered crime and punishment, this time. 2302, the accused was retained under PPC, in which case the accused was acquitted under section 7307/34, it is unclear. Who could have injured the witness? advocate for immigration from Phool nagar lawyer