MOAZZAM ALIAS MAUJI versus THE STATE
Sections 13 and 13 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the allegations against the 510 accused, were evidence that 30 bore loaded with 10 bullets and a hand grenade were recovered, by a prosecution of 30 No report was submitted. Although some of the reports allegedly provided by the expert were brought to the record, there was no evidence that the author of this report was an expert in the supply of Section 4040, CR PCs, expert expert reports. In the absence of, it can be said that it was not actually a 30 bore pistol, but rather a toy pistol for a child; in the absence of recording the expert's statement, the report submitted by the expert could not be accepted and There can be no punishment against the accused. The case is underway and a fresh verdict of the case was needed after recording the expert's statement regarding the weapons recovered from the alleged suspect and the sentencing sentence by trial was set aside and After recording the expert's statements, the case was remanded to decide the same decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Shahkot lawyer