Find a Lawyer

KHUSHAL KHAN versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.

Complaint notice before filing a complaint for section 25 Muslim Commercial Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules, 1981, Item 12 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 of the Muslim Commercial Bank Limited An appeal was filed against the next higher authority against his dismissal order in the job, but he was dismissed. The Labor Court dismissed their complaint request. The Labor Appellate Tribunal dismissed this appeal on the basis that it had not given a notice of complaint to its employer, and that its Department of Appeal could not be construed as a complaint notice, which was filed under Section 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance. Under the A was a legal requirement to be fulfilled by the worker, the constitutional application filed by the applicant was also dismissed, the petitioner did not appeal the authenticity of the High Court. A notice of complaint was given to his employer against his dismissal order; the appellate authority was always regarded as a duty. The NTC and the regional body different from the original authority that qualified the appointment were appointed as regional authorities. , While he appealed to the president of the bank, who was not his appointing authority applicant, a cashier Category II official, so according to Muslim Commercial Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules 1981, the president of the bank was his appointing authority. May not, but the Regional Manager shall be the applicant for the purposes of Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Bank President applicant before the Industrial Relations Ordinance section can not be treated as a complaint notice within the meaning of 25, the applicant had initiated proceedings against the defendant incompetent famous high court advocate from Jhand lawyer