Find a Lawyer

WAZIR KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N. W.F.P.

Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 8 Seniority Fiction Past and Closed Deals of the NWFP, Appointment of Appointment of Seniority List After 15 years, a party of public servants was appointed as the same batch of applicants for the list of defendants in the year-list Was placed senior to 1979, while in the subsequent list prepared in 1981, the appellant was not objected to by the junior appellant from time to time, the appellant re-ignited the matter after a gap of 15 years. That was a bad post on the seniority list. From time to time there is a constant error and every time it gives rise to the latest cause of action, the service tribunal erred in rejecting the appeal because there is a time validity restriction where the appellant periodically issues a sanitary list. No objection was raised. From time to time, it will be deemed that the appellant has handled this and accepted the sanity handed down to him. The superannuation list, published in 1987, deals with the issue of seniority coming to the final as a past and closed transaction. And a new representation cannot be re-considered after a period of about 15 years, through a new representational seniority. In the present case, neither the principle contained in section 8 of the Northwestern Frontier Province Civil Servants Act, 1973 was determined, nor was there any violation of any principle made under it. The seniority list, published in 1979, has no valid basis for declaring the defendants senior by denying the qualities assigned to the parties by the Public Service Commission. 1979, the qualifications assigned to them by the Commission best law firm from Wana lawyer