IMAM BUX versus SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE/RENT CONTROLLER, DISTRICT MALIR, KARACHI
Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 During the continuation of the default tenancy in payment of rent, the sale agreement was made with the landlord and the landlord denied the tenant relationship. Following the denial of its obligation to pay the rent, the controller of the execution of the sale agreement accepted the request. The first appeal filed by the tenant was dismissed. The tenant believed that since there was a dispute between the parties regarding the landlord and tenant relationship, he was not responsible for paying the rent until his case was filed. ? The sale of the deal was finalized. And that the rent controller did not approve any order for the rent to be submitted, so his removal by default was illegal. The occupancy of the tenant in the disputed premises was not subject to the sale agreement, but for this reason the tenant was the tenant in the premises. Landlord and tenant relationship are controversial and promised to issue instructions to the tenant to pay the rent fairly and deliberately, in which case, this was not a prerequisite. It was only fitting to ascertain the facts listed by the two courts below. , Legal and correct, where no defect was found, the constitutional application was barred
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Hunza Nagar lawyer