ALLAH DITTA versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, (VII of 1979), Section 10/11 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), FIR of Section 380 bail were filed with a delay of 17 days. The car, forcing the abductor, negated the element of abduction, as the case was alleged to apply to the provisions of section 11 of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement Hoodood) Ordinance 1979, so it appears that Suspected section 8080 PP, PPC was already deleted from the FIR, there was no independent evidence related to the commission of the rape or adultery charged with the kidnapper, with which to support such accusation. for The testing was not checked on. For the purpose of continuing the physical custody of the accused in the jail along with the kidnapper registered with the spouse was unlikely to be of any benefit when the investigation had already been completed. The pre-sentence sentenced the defendant to a further investigation of his offense under section 497 (2) of the case, and the CC accused was admitted on bail accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Lala rukh lawyer
