Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MUHAMMAD ABDUL LATIF

Article 11, Part II Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application remanding the notification to the notification officer of the parties, in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction over disputes between the parties, as directed by the High Court in the Constitutional Jurisdiction. Was detained before the High Court. The High Court had disposed of it with the consent of the parties and they had no objection to the notification officer's remand of the matter, keeping in view the nature of the dispute for its disposal in the direction involved. had gone. The parties, the Supreme Court, found that the decision passed by the High Court was not inconsistent with the decision passed by the High Court in the previous constitutional petition, nor was the settlement authority justified in proceeding with the directions given in the judgment. Was limited to them only. The reopening of the entire case on the basis of the applicant's limitation and order in the said application was not valid on the 31st Commissioner approved by the Rehabilitation Commissioner in 1955, when many changes occurred during the intervention period, the Supreme Court did not consider that appropriate. Parties are not allowed to enter the litigation again after half a century has passed. Refuses to interfere with High Court's decision to exercise constitutional jurisdiction law firms from Mangi lawyer