Find a Lawyer

SAID MUHAMMAD versus AMJAD IQBAL

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 & 21 (a) (h) The specific performance of the contract of sale of the suit land between the parties was brought to trial between the parties and the plaintiff / vendor received a substantial amount and the remaining amount. I needed to think about. Registrar for Sale Contractor / Vendor who agreed to pay the estimated amount was all present on the date of the Registrar's office and appeared before it, but the defendant / seller did not refuse to comply with the sale agreement. Imported, but the trial court set aside the appellate court's decisions and decrees for the specific performance of the contract, and replaced the contract specific performance order with the receipt of money attached to the requirements of section 21 (a). went. (B) The specific relief for the sale of the Special Relief Act, 1877, has been found to be in favor of the plaintiff after the execution of the plaintiff's execution. The money, which was obtained by the claimant for the enforcement of a legally binding contract for sale, was not denied on the basis of section 21 (a) (h) of the Special Relief Act, 1877 Could have been, and was not, arbitrary exercise by the appellate court. Once a genuine and legitimate contract for sale was reached that was executed by the claimant / seller, he was under legal obligation to sell the suit land in favor of the claimant / seller. , But the right received by the vendor could not be thwarted, nor was there any existence. Develop Appeal Court Decisions and Decisions to Reduce Opportunity to Decline property advocates from Malakand lawyer