Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus ABDUL HAMID

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (c), 19 and 136 (1) The income from the property was purchased by his son Assisi and he traded it but the Assessing Officer paid the rent. The First Appellate Authority dismissed the SC's appeal by distinguishing the matter when CITV Mushtaq Ahmed (1989 PTD1) but the tribunal dismissed the increase, citing the decision. ? He did not take his personal possession for his personal business, nor was such an issue raised, nor was the tribunal decided to exclude the shop from the definition of term property, if such The matter could have been looked at if the matter were from Assisi. In this case it was done from a different angle such as: Re: CIT v Mushtaq Ahmed (1989 PTD1) Assisi did not occupy commercial property for the purpose of his business, thus he had to pay. Tax on his extraordinary income famous lower court advocate from Khyber Agency lawyer