AKBAR HUSSAIN versus ZEHRA BAI
Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963 Section 17 (4) (b) (i) Personal Requirement for Sower Home Building for his son Landland did not mention that the shop was intended for him and confessed. As if he had never done anything. Or the business and he did not sue for his personal use, the tenant had dismissed the petition but the High Court allowed the tenants to be rented out of the commercial premises under the Cantonment Rent Retention Act, 1963. The same limitation was imposed on entry. It can be made only if the landlord's proprietary need for the land or the occupation of the property is proven. The landlord's interior had his own case scattered and he was unable to prove his need for the damaged premises, which led to the High Court ruling. And the controller of rent was reinstated that the application for leave of appeal was converted into an appeal and allowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Bannu lawyer