Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Reconsideration of Evidence Punishment Injury and Accusation of Accusation The prosecution's witnesses assigned specific overtakes to the suspect, which was verified by medical evidence. Was made and there are no material contradictions. Contradictions were found between the testimony of the prosecution witnesses and the medical testimony the trial court sentenced the accused to death, which was maintained by the High Court. The defendants 'conviction was that the distance the prosecutors' witnesses determined was not proven by medical evidence that they were either illiterate or semi-illiterate, unable to identify the exact exact distance between the victim. The testimony of the witness was positive and the witnesses were credible and natural witnesses could testify to the witnesses from where they were shot. Not put aside, based on the theoretical opinion, the High Court and based on the evidence of the prosecution presented legal, valid and robust reasons for reaching the culprit's conclusions which were beyond reasonable doubt that the High Court Refused to intervene in the sentence. The following was approved by the courts as there was no controlling or mitigating circumstance to reduce the sentence. inheritance advocates near Kharan lawyer