Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Evidence of grave and sudden provocation Supports the ocular account Medical evidence confirms the murder of his wife in a crime found by an empty weapon Was charged. The allegation that the deceased had illicit relations with another person, and upon seeing the deceased in an abusive manner with his family, he had committed, under serious and sudden provocation, the crime that the incident was a room located in such a place. From which Paramor could not escape. But the only victim of honor was the deceased wife of the accused Medical evidence proved that the victim was completely invisible and was dressed under costume. The trial court denied the defense version and sentenced the accused to death. The ocular version was considered a permanent one to make the High Court reliable and reliable as to what version of medical evidence and evidence was produced, as evidenced by the pistol, vacancy recovery and forensic science laboratory reports. The trial court found that the accused's conviction was beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence awarded by the High Court was upheld; the defendants, both legally and legally, will be prosecuted by the courts as a guarantor of interference in the detection of a false statement or lack of evidence. And the sudden provocation was denied by the courts on the reasonable definition of the evidence that the plea was not convincing and did not appeal the argument. It is not contested by any direct or concrete evidence best law firm from Jalozai lawyer