NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MESSRS HASHMI SONS
Sections 6 (2) (A) (4) and 8 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 189, dismissed the special court's request for execution by the Civil Court after the implementation of banking on 28 3 1983. Filed in connection with interpretation order. Companies (Recovery of Loans) (Amendment) Ordinance (II of 1983) A valid decision passed by the Supreme Court which can be given the foregoing effect was the decision of the past and closed transactions as per the date on which it was announced and It had no effect. The High Court's decision under Article 189 of the Constitution ultimately led to the reopening of the rights of the parties under the High Court decision, however the High Court decision was raised on the same question of law but this will not affect the right. ? In the present party, the parties, decided by the High Court verdict and decree, were not challenged by the decree of the decree, which was finalized and it was a past and closed transaction request such as banking. The court erroneously rejected the verdict, which will be adjourned and will be decided according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Timergara lawyer