Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Clauses 230 (b), 4?4, 7 337a (iii) and 7 337a (i) The testimony of the witnesses in this case was completely free and true, no doubt he was the real brother of the victim but There was no enmity or resentment. False statements and such relationships were not enough to doubt his testimony. The prosecution's witnesses had no special interest from the complaining party and were completely unpopular in the days leading up to the incident. And the incident was delayed by 4/5 hours after the F, LR was filed. The situation was natural. Inaccurate translation of the injury seat was possible in these situations and it was There was no justifiable basis for denying that anyone, who had suffered an injury in this case, went out of their way to suffer the loss of their family honor, which in their favor was a loss. Was punished, and changed, however, under section 2302 (b), PPC, the sentence of life imprisonment and other offenses was upheld. advocate for immigration from Malakand lawyer