Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAP ZAKRIA versus JAVED AHIVIAD

In the Constitution Holding Ordinance of the West Pakistan, Articles 2 (j) of 1960, 10 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the controversial route in the Constitutional Application Strengthening Scheme was made between the applicants - only because they were land / Dera. can go. One of the respondents, who ended up there, said that such a schematic dispute path was neither implemented nor opened to the public in the last 33 years, but the surrender of the respondents by professionals. Using the alternative / existing route voluntarily generated from the mainland = Such inaction and resentment by the sustainability authority and the defendants created the right of the applicants to open the disputed route. Their garden will not be broken into pieces, which is then replaced by the Public Utilities Additional Commissioner. Asth was not. The visit confirmed the facts as the residents adopted, maintained, enforced, and continued the village by consensus. Such a consensus was adopted by the West Pakistan Sustainability Holding Ordinance, 1960 and the rules and regulations set thereunder. The basis and spirit of the constitutional intent of the existing was to make claims contained in the constitutional petition about the existing route, its use and non-implementation / inauguration. In the absence of any specific and specific refusal by the Board of Revenue, the respondent to the dispute path shall be recognized by the principle of non-crossing, while keeping the order of the Additional Commissioner aside, accepting the implementation of such scheme on the disputed route. Was not done Due to the controversial route to the present route, the residents of the village, including the respondents, have had some kind of problem. pakistani advocates Jampur lawyer