Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus THE STATE

Sections 2 (b), 4 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 Determining the age of the accused Sessions Judge the child was declared a juvenile and ordered that his case be sent to Juvenile Justice. Running under the System Ordinance 2000, at the time of the Commission on Crime Certificate Crime, the accused was identified with the identity card of 18 years and 3 months old which had already been issued to the accused and the election list also showed that The age of the accused at the time of the incident was over 18 years should be between 17 and 18 years The X-ray report and ossification test will not be established with the assurance of age and the possibility of any difference, There will be years left on both sides The medical report was merely an opinion and cannot be conclusive and conclusive against the evidence. The record was brought by the complainant through registration in the Birth Register and a copy of the identity card issued in favor of the accused, under the circumstances, was not a child under the Judicial Justice System Ordinance, 2000 trial judge was tried by the High Court under common law. Was instructed to run jobs for advocates from Fort Abbas lawyer